Kiddy · Compact / travel

Kiddy City'n Move

Based on 2 independent scored tests: Stiftung Warentest (2016), ÖKO-TEST (2015).

Tested for Europe & UK

Shortlist score

Poor

Medium confidence

Where to buy

Most links search the shop for this model. Check that the version on sale matches the one tested.

Older test. The newest test of this product is from 2016. It may no longer be sold, or sold in a revised version, so it isn't ranked.

Warnings from testers

⚠ Failed a safety test⚠ Harmful substances found

See the test results below for details, and check whether the model you're buying is the one tested.

Test results

Each score as the tester published it, converted to our 0–100 scale. Weight is how much the result counts towards the score.

Stiftung Warentest DE · Consumer organisation

Stiftung Warentest Buggys 04/2016

5,0

mangelhaft

Our scale10

weight 0.34

Same test also published by Kassensturz (SRF), Konsument (VKI), counted once.

⚠ Failed a safety test Retailer magazine: 'mangelhaft (5,0)'; connecting screw came loose in durability test so the buggy partly folded by itself.

View on babyartikel.de ↗ quoted result

ÖKO-TEST DE · Consumer organisation

ÖKO-TEST Buggys 05/2015

mangelhaft

Our scale12

weight 0.34

⚠ Harmful substances found Score as quoted by testberichte.de from ÖKO-TEST 5/2015 (published 24.04.2015). 8 Produkte im Test | testberichte.de summary: „... größtes Faltvolumen, größtes Leergewicht und auch gefaltet einer der längsten Buggys. ... Ansonsten recht komfortabel ... Leider auch zu viele Schadstoffe.“

View on testberichte.de ↗ quoted result

2 older or duplicate results not counted

Kassensturz (SRF) CH · Consumer organisation

Kassensturz Buggys im Test 2016 (with Stiftung Warentest)

ungenügend

Our scale4

not counted

Not counted: Same joint ICRT test as Stiftung Warentest.

⚠ Failed a safety test 'Ungenügend': an important connecting screw came loose in the durability test; affected batch repairable via dealers.

View on srf.ch ↗

Konsument (VKI) AT · Consumer organisation

Konsument 04/2016

10%

nicht zufriedenstellend

Our scale10

not counted

Not counted: Same joint ICRT test as Stiftung Warentest.

Kindgerechte gestaltung: durchschnittlich
Handhabung: durchschnittlich
Haltbarkeit: nicht zufriedenstellend
Sicherheit: gut
Schadstoffe: durchschnittlich

⚠ Harmful substances found⚠ Failed a safety test Score as quoted by testberichte.de from Konsument 4/2016 (published 23.03.2016). Platz 13 von 15 | safety-fail per the same joint test as published by Stiftung Warentest.

View on testberichte.de ↗ quoted result

Top-ranked alternatives

74

Bugaboo Dragonfly
Which? 83%
72

Joolz Aer+
Warentest gut BabyGearLab 84% Konsument 56%
67

Bugaboo Butterfly
Warentest 2,4 BabyGearLab 81% Konsument 62%
65

Gesslein Smiloo Happy+
Warentest 2,0 Konsument 70%
64

Maxi-Cosi Soho
Warentest 2,2 Konsument 66%

How we turn these into one number: methodology. Tested 2015–2016.