Angelcare · Audio

Angelcare AC423-D

Based on 2 independent scored tests: Konsument (VKI) (2015), ÖKO-TEST (2018). The test scores average 72. With only 2 tests, the ranking score is pulled down a little until more testers confirm it.

Tested for Europe & UK ★ Test winner

Shortlist score

Good

Medium confidence

Where to buy

Most links search the shop for this model. Check that the version on sale matches the one tested.

Older test. The newest test of this product is from 2018. It may no longer be sold, or sold in a revised version, so it isn't ranked.

Test results

Each score as the tester published it, converted to our 0–100 scale. Weight is how much the result counts towards the score.

Konsument (VKI) AT · Consumer organisation

KONSUMENT Babyfone 9/2015 (Stiftung Warentest test data)

56%

durchschnittlich

Our scale56

weight 0.40

Übertragung (45%): durchschnittlich
Handhabung (25%): durchschnittlich
Akku (10%): sehr gut
Umwelteigenschaften (20%): gut

Prozente = overall score (0-100); percentages in subscore names are weights; same lab test as Stiftung Warentest 2015

View on archiv.vki.at ↗

ÖKO-TEST DE · Consumer organisation

ÖKO-TEST Babyfone (Jahrbuch Kleinkinder 2018, 18.01.2018)

sehr gut

Our scale90

weight 0.34

★ Test winner only recommendable device of 14 (retested 2014 winner); oekotest.de (https://www.oekotest.de/kinder-familie/Babyphone-im-Test-Strahlung-bei-zehn-Geraeten-stark-erhoeht_110625_1.html) confirms one sehr gut and 10 of 14 failing for electrosmog but names the model only in the product list; model attribution via utopia.de summary. Touchscreen version AC720-D had strongly elevated radiation.

View on utopia.de ↗ quoted result

Top-ranked alternatives

67

Philips Avent SCD713
Warentest 1,9★ Consumentenbond best audio baby monitor
66

Philips Avent SCD723
Warentest 1,9 Konsument 72%
63

Reer Nova
Warentest 2,2
61

Babymoov Premium Care
Warentest 2,4
61

Reer Projektor-Babyphone
Konsument 62%

How we turn these into one number: methodology. Tested 2015–2018.